Karen Fritsch
Framer
F24 Frame
TheKnowledges
F- Humanities 24-Law
Question: No.69
Framer
F24 Frame
TheKnowledges
F- Humanities 24-Law
Question: No.69
what kind of
FRAME
would be remontantFury ?
FRAME
would be remontantFury ?
Huh?
Now I have to square this circle - answering the question: What kind of framing would the state of being (archetype) remontant Fury be? I'll rephrase it for myself:
The remontant fury as a framing.
Nevertheless, there is still a loud "Huh”?
Remontant Fury versus image framing. I see no connection, no way for me to create a connection - even a mental one - between these two things.
An analysis of each individual:
Remontant - something blossoming again. strengthening, perhaps also supporting.
Fury - something boundary-breaking, opening, also destructive.
Framing - something protective, demarcating, sometimes supporting and also shaping.
The image frame separates a work - a painting, a drawing or a graphic - from the outside. It draws a boundary between the work and its surroundings - to the left, right, front, back, top and bottom.
It is the protective house of the work.
In most cases it is subordinate to the work, sometimes it is designed by the artist as part of the piece and results in a complete work of art.
The rF is the counter-idea to the protective and usually calming function of the frame and the process of framing.
The rF is the anti-frame.
An act of dissolving, breaking the boundaries and leaving the work to new growth and form-finding.
A framework that promotes change and development. Imaginable as an idea of the artist and realizable by her. Initiating an active interaction between work and frame.
A chemical reaction implanted in the frame - triggered by physical changes in the surroundings of the frame. Or on a spiritual level through new emotional states of the viewer of the frame.
These thoughts leave my level as a craftswoman. The aim of framing is a static one - to create a final state that gives the work security - also from a conservation point of view. This corresponds to the basic idea of the frame.
the rF stands for movement and change. for a new, second form that gives the work a new meaning, perhaps physically changing or even destroying it.
The thoughts slip into the realm of science fiction.
The framing as remontant fury.
There remains a big question mark, a space that I cannot enter or shape.
A great impossibility and a deep contradiction.
One last "huh"?